Adam KimMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Menu
← BACK TO PROJECTS

Engineering case study

Automated water-treatment prototype

An integrated course prototype combining a servo-driven powder dispenser, a geared magnetic mixer, turbidity sensing, and automated pumping through clarification and sand filtration.

Team project · Water pre-treatment · SolidWorks & Arduino

Project status
Completed · course prototype
Disciplines
Mechanical design / Mechatronics / Automation / Additive manufacturing
My role
Shared design, fabrication, integration, testing & analysis
SolidWorks drawing showing exploded and orthographic views of the complete water-treatment prototype
Team SolidWorks assembly drawing from the report. The prototype was built and tested; the supplied visuals document its CAD design.

01

An integrated treatment process

Our team designed, built, and tested a small automated water pre-treatment prototype for the course scenario of Awesome, Nunavut. The process added an alum mixture to water containing bentonite clay, mixed and settled the suspension, then transferred water through a sand filter.

The main engineering challenge was integrating powder metering, magnetic mixing, fluid transfer, and sensor-based sequencing within a compact assembly. The prototype demonstrated clarification and filtration; it did not establish that the output was safe to drink.

02

My role within the team

Responsibilities were shared across the team. I contributed to mechanical design, prototype fabrication and integration, testing, analysis, and documentation. The assemblies, automated process, and results presented here are shared team accomplishments.

03

Functional requirements

Prototype requirements documented in the report
RequirementDesign consequence
Dispense 0.8 ± 0.2 g of alum mixtureUse a repeatable metering cavity and controlled discharge
Fit within 204 × 305 mm and 260 mm heightIntegrate reservoirs, mechanisms, and electronics compactly
Work within a 30,000 mm³ printed-material allowanceConstrain the volume of custom printed components
Produce 50 mL of treated water per cycleCoordinate filling, dosing, mixing, settling, and extraction
Operate automatically with accessible reservoirs and protected electronicsSequence sensors and actuators while accounting for water handling and maintenance

The listed dose is a requirement, not evidence that every dispense achieved that tolerance. The report identifies powder-delivery reliability as an unresolved issue.

04

System operation

  • Start the cycle and fill the coagulation tank using a centrifugal pump; the team checked a 250 mL input volume.
  • Rotate the servo-driven metering wheel to release the alum mixture.
  • Run the geared magnetic stirrer to distribute the coagulant, then allow clarification.
  • Monitor the turbidity-sensor signal and use the selected threshold to permit extraction.
  • Transfer water using a peristaltic pump through a syringe-based sand filter into the output reservoir.

Arduino coordinated the sequence. The report describes tests of the start input, pumps, servo, mixer, and sensor threshold, but does not include a usable code listing; the emphasis here is the implemented system behaviour.

05

A rotary powder dispenser

SolidWorks exploded and assembled views of a funnel-fed powder dispenser with inner and outer wheels and a servo mount
Clock-wheel dispensing assembly from the team report.

The dispensing mechanism used an inner wheel with a metering cavity inside a stationary outer wheel. After filling, the servo rotated the wheel through 180° to discharge the dose. The solid perimeter blocked the feed opening during rotation to limit continued powder flow.

The design specified a 0.4 mm sliding clearance between the wheels and a friction-fit connection to the servo. Printed alignment and powder behaviour made the mechanism less reliable than the geometric model suggested: the report describes jamming, misalignment, and inconsistent dispensing.

The team proposed revising the clearance and considering vibration to assist powder flow. These were recommendations for a later iteration, not demonstrated fixes.

06

Geared magnetic mixing

Exploded SolidWorks view of the DC motor, worm, 50-tooth gear, supports, fasteners and magnetic mixing components
Mixing mechanism drawing from the team report, showing the worm-drive reduction and supporting structure.

A DC motor drove a worm-and-wheel reduction that rotated magnets coupled to a mixing bar in the tank. The selected design used a nominal 50:1 reduction, with 30:1 and 20:1 alternatives considered if the initial configuration did not perform as expected.

Testing exposed an axial constraint problem: magnetic attraction lifted the mixing-bar guide into the housing, increasing friction and disrupting gear engagement. The report records a temporary remedy, while recommending a more robust guide arrangement and a smaller assembly footprint.

This failure connected magnetic coupling forces, bearing or guide support, gear alignment, and packaging. Adequate motor output alone did not ensure reliable mixing.

07

Integration testing & reported results

Results described in the report; individual trial logs were not supplied
MeasureReported observationInterpretation
Input fill250 mL checked during pump testingPump-volume verification
Output50 mL per cycleReported prototype throughput
Cycle durationLess than 10 minutesReported overall process time
Sensor responseApproximately 4.1 V; report also states output within 0.3 V of clean tap waterElectrical comparison, without a supplied calibration curve
AutomationCorrect sequencing and operation without intervention reportedDemonstrated integration; repeated-cycle reliability not quantified

The report associates approximately 4.1 V with a turbidity value, but provides no calibration record supporting that conversion. This case study therefore reports the voltage comparison without claiming a verified NTU value, regulatory compliance, or removal of all contaminants.

08

Where the prototype needed improvement

Failure modes identified through construction and testing
SubsystemIssueProposed next iteration
Powder meteringWheel misalignment, friction, jamming, and inconsistent dischargeImprove guidance and clearance; evaluate vibration and repeat dose-mass trials
Magnetic mixerGuide lift, housing contact, gear slip and wearConstrain axial movement and verify alignment under magnetic load
PackagingLarge mixing assembly complicated support of the tankReduce footprint while retaining service access and stiffness
MeasurementSensor-voltage comparison without calibration dataCalibrate the sensor and log repeated tests against reference samples

The strongest outcome was a working integrated prototype together with specific failure modes that could inform the next design. The full-scale treatment plant discussed in the report was a hypothetical extension; it was not built or validated.

09

Engineering lessons

This project showed why subsystem checks have to be followed by testing the assembled system. Printed fits affected powder delivery, magnetic forces changed the mixer’s alignment, and the sensor location and threshold affected when water was extracted.

A further iteration would prioritize repeatable dosing, positive mechanical guidance, and calibrated measurement before scaling throughput. Those changes would make the process easier to evaluate and the control decisions easier to justify.

← All projects